STROMATOLITES which are original organisms of the time of the evolution of life on the Earth. picture of the BAY of kutch and Perth Australlia are attached along with gangeshwar dome strombolites fossils in KUTCH‏

Dear EDITORIALS, Friends of the Science, History, paleontology and Geology,


15) 100s of Books of Archaeological library WITH ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ARCHEOLOGY , Forbidden archaeology  including Civilisation and DHOLAVIRA video library, INCA, MAYA, EGYPT, INDUS etc. 

16) 100s of Books of Geological Science Library including fossils and DINO fossils complete sets of Photographic libraries INCLUDING Forbidden Geology, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF GEOLOGY.  including video library INCLUDING Forbidden Geology video.


 Many doubts were raised when ETV and Bombay SAMACHAR broadcasted the following news, with doubt that the PURVA – Aadi MANAV ancestor was not existing at that time but now the skeleton evidence came out that the ancestor missing link was there at that time before (about 22 to 5.5 million years ago) between 11 and 16 million years ago.

The partial skeleton of this 13-million-year-old ‘missing link’ was found by palaeontologists working at a dig site near Barcelona in Spain.

That time matches with the Rameshwarm bridge and RAMAVATAR and Koteshwar – RAVANa History (Tretauga), means Formation of MONKEY and Apes army formation by DEVAs. that will rule out all the doubts raised for the PURVA – Aadi MANAV.
Hominid Foot prints found in older layers may have been formed later in the geological process but the study of Photomicrographs and infrared photography is required so that to eliminate that there were no signs of carving or artificial markings in or around the prints. A study of microscopic count of sand grains is ralso required so indicating that the material within the prints had been impacted, and created as the result of a force pressing down on the firmament while it was soft.
These facts show that the prints were made by the natural result of pressure from the human foot, and in no way could have been duplicated by carving nor only the pheneonmena of honeycomb appearance as the study of Photomicrographs and infrared photography can differnciate the compact sand particles under the pressurepoints which are not in honeycomb pattern appearance.
Many geologists and paleontologists do visit with curiocity of the specimen and the subject but have no background of study of Photomicrographs and infrared photography and its geological/paleontological applications so do not have any clue or chance to study those subjects in that angle of research. unfortunately lack of resourses and facility for such a research. 
Phase Two Fossils: Burroughs Conjecture


The most cogent explanation of anomalous fossil footprints is perhaps offered by Dr. William Greely Burroughs, of Berea College in Kentucky. Dr. Burroughs conjecture is that a depression  in fossil-bearing rock may, long after the original fossils have been formed, be filled with a sediment that in its turn may also become the medium in which the impression of a footprint or the body of a creature is fossilized. When this second period of fossilization is complete the newly formed rock may be indistinguishable from the older formation, and the new fossils may appear to have formed at the same time as those which are much older. Thus, several fossilization processes may wind up looking like a footprint made at the same time. This is undoubtebly the case in many instances, but the theory is lacking in several respects. Firstly, fossilized human footprints have been found deep within rocks that show no evidence of discontinuous formation, not just at the junction of sedimentary layers. Secondly, out of place fossils are often inconsistent not only with the ages of associated fossils but also with the rock strata and the age conventionally ascribed to them.
New Study Supports Idea That Primates, Dinosaurs Coexisted !!!!


Sientists have acquired new data supporting the idea that the last ancestor shared by all living primates walked with the dinosaurs more than 80 million years ago. The results came from a new technique used to reconstruct the course of animal evolution.

Previously, opposing scientific camps estimated that the animal that gave rise to the primates lived as recently as 55 million years ago and as long ago as 90 million years. The newly proposed date is closer to the older end of the range.

That’s significant because the older estimate, which was derived from studies based on molecular genetics, identifies the earliest primates as contemporaries of the dinosaurs. The younger date, which was based on fossil records, represents a period after the dinosaurs had already become extinct. ‘Our results agree broadly with a molecular estimate [and] contradict widely accepted palaeontological estimates,’ Simon Tavaré of the University of Southern California and his colleagues reported in the journal Nature. Their finding sprang from a scientific collaboration that straddled the fields of biology and mathematics and spanned research centers from California to the Swiss Alps. Working with colleagues from Harvard University, the University of Washington, Chicago’s Field Museum, and institutions in England and Switzerland, Tavaré used a novel mathematical approach to help answer a major piece of the evolutionary puzzle. Past Views The search for the first primate—that is, the last animal to have been an ancestor of all members of the primate family tree—has long intrigued scientists and others interested in humanity’s evolutionary origins. From the oldest known fossil remains of primates, paleontologists have determined that some ancient members of our evolutionary family lived and died at least as far back as 55 million years ago. Fossils alone, however, cannot disclose precisely when members of the last common ancestral species began to segregate into distinct populations that eventually gave rise to the modern array of some 200 primate species. That’s because the fossil record is incomplete. Paleontologists can’t tell how close any particular specimen was to the progenitor of the primates. So, to approach the problem from another angle, scientists in the field of molecular genetics have compared subtle differences in the DNA of living primates.
Geneticists can tell how recently two species diverged from a common ancestor from information etched in the organisms’ genes: The fewer differences researchers find between two genetic codes, the more recently the species parted evolutionary company.
Using this method, geneticists have concluded that about 90 million years have elapsed since all living primates shared their last common ancestor.
Based on such studies, evolutionary biologists such as Pennsylvania State University’s Blair Hedges believe that early primates lived alongside the great reptiles. ‘[Primates and other] major groups of mammals evolved for tens of millions of years before the dinosaurs became extinct,’ Hedges said. That mass extinction occurred about 65 million years ago.Fleshing out the Fossil Record

To reconcile the genetics-based date with the comparatively young estimates of paleontologists, Tavaré and his colleagues fashioned an evolutionary tree of the primates as it’s known from fossils.

Not wanting to depend entirely on what paleontologists have turned up, the researchers then fleshed out the rudimentary tree with educated guesswork. They used mathematical equations to predict how many species of primates are not represented in the fossil record, and to predict when and for how long those species may have lived.

The resulting model—based loosely on hard evidence but expanded to take into account species that lived and died out but remain unknown to science—suggests that the earliest primate lived about 81.5 million years ago, long before the age of the oldest fossils uncovered by paleontologists.

‘Naturally,’ said Hedges, ‘I am pleased with this result because it shows agreement with our molecular-clock studies.’

Tavaré’s team suggested that the earliest primates might have been small, nocturnal creatures that inhabited tropical forests. But, assuming they did exist that long ago, numerous forms could have evolved prior to the fateful cataclysm that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.

That event, presumably caused by a giant impact from outerspace, didn’t wipe out all primates living at the time, but probably spared relatively few of them, Tavaré theorized. Those primates that survived would have subsequently evolved into myriad species.

‘Of course, this is all speculation,’ Tavaré acknowledged. ‘We have not found any fossils in that bin yet.’

In fact, scientists may never know how these proposed lost kin of ours looked—or be certain they existed at all—unless paleontologists someday recover fossilized remains. 


President:’Kutch Science Foundation’.
Founder :’Kutch Amateurs Astronomers Club – Bhuj – Kutch’.
Life Member:’kutch Itihaas Parishad’.,,

More Information of  Stromatolites @ 

‘The Strombolites‘ was inspired by a visit to a lake south of Perth, one of two places in Australia where ‘strombolites‘ can be seen. These are a kind of ‘living’ rock which date back to the dawn of life on Earth


Though geologist all over the world do visit to research in Kutch but Geological study has not been given such a priority in KUTCH. Kutch do have fossilised strombolites in Gangeshwar dome area. when it was under shalow sea water it has LIVING fossils at that time but later with the uplift of the area from the sea bed. those fossils are plenty on the gangeshwar hill area.


Though Australians and Americans geologist has dome more to study similar fossils in PERTH of AUSTRALIA. none of geologist has given the time to the strombolites foosils of  Gangeshwar dome of KUTCH. similarly Bay of Kutch is full of misteries. Diving in bay of kutch reveals a beutiful coral seabed and planty of Living STROMATOLITES which are original organisms of the time of the evolution of life on the Earth. picture of the BAY of kutch and Perth Australlia are attached along with gangeshwar dome strombolites fossils in KUTCH


Which proves the KUTCH land formation is since the LIFE evolved on the Earth and well beyond the time we think. and need more study of the fossil records. documentry film for this subject is vailable for reference study in the Geological Library of KUTCH SCIENCE FOUNDATION GEOLOGICAl section.


Geology Department, Univ of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, and ANDRES, Miriam S., Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149

In honor of Prof. Ginsburg and the numerous insightful conversations we have had with him, we present new results on processes causing lithification in modern Bahamian stromatolites. As Ginsburg has argued for longer than we have been scientists, understanding how modern stromatolites or “strombolites” form and lithify is critical to properly interpreting the origins of ancient stromatolites. Microbial roles in stromatolite lithification can be traced in carbonates because microbial communities produce carbon isotopic shifts when they cycle local DIC (dissolved inorganic carbon). Thus, the isotopic composition of carbonates can record ancient microbial CO2 cycling, providing insights into the processes of stromatolite growth and microbial influences on carbonate chemistry.
In shallow subtidal modern stromatolites from Highborne Cay, Bahamas, authigenic aragonite preserves a carbon isotopic record of heterotrophic microbial influences on DIC; authigenic aragonite is >1 per mil depleted in 13C relative to aragonite that precipitated in equilibrium with local seawater. Even though cyanobacteria raise pH during peak photosynthesis, more aragonite precipitates when and where respiration influences local DIC. These results are consistent with 1) sulfate reduction promoting carbonate precipitation and 2) calcium release during decay of exopolymeric substances as previously reported. Thus, heterotrophs play a more important role than phototrophs in Bahamian stromatolite lithification on a local scale. However, organic matter produced by cyanobacteria supports the heterotrophic community. Thus, the absence of an autotrophic isotopic signature in the rock record cannot imply the absence of photosynthetic activity.

Heterotrophic signatures may also be difficult to observe in ancient stromatolites. With continued lithification, the 1-2‰ δ13C shifts will be diluted by carbonate precipitation during early diagenesis and burial. Thus, microbial isotopic signatures in shallow subtidal stromatolites are only likely to be identified in exceptional circumstances. Identifying ancient microbial signatures will require careful sampling to separate carbonate components with different isotopic signatures and carbonates that precipitated on the spatial scales influenced by microbial communities.

If oyu are just waiting to hear for the Hominid Fossils found in the KUTCH, your wish will be copleted very soon in near future! teams are working to get the perfect evidence proofs and soon reach to conclusion to clear the confusions.
Do not be surprised if you get a good vews of unexpected HOMINID fossil find in the KUTCH of GUJARAT INDIA. Though most of the geologist stick to the darwinian beliefs, But thats not the coplete truth and thats the reality that darwinian theory is not the coplete science of creation of the GOD.
Many of the geologist are in favour of the New Study Supporting the Idea That Primates and Dinosaurs Coexisted. and  Many geologists do stay away from those Geologist but must not afraid of these but dare to read their finding facts too.
GEOLOGIST opposing those viws must read the BOOK about the hominid evolution,  the canals studied of many living primates, ‘Review of Forbidden Archaeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race.’  

Books and Documentry Filming evedenses are avilable for reference ONLy at out Science library geology sections.
MANY GEOLOGISTS did LAUGH when first news of fossils of GIANTS CROCODILION published very first time just after the KUTCH EARTHQUAKE in 2001. But Now atleast FOUR crocodillion fossil specimens are discoverd from Kutch sediments. Though many have not visited those museum places to see them may be lack of information to them.

But here is details of those 1) in PANDHROW Mine GEOLOGY MUSEUM at PANDROW – KUTCH @
3) specimen is under process of retrieving
and the 4) the very first and the BIGGEST OF ALL is been destroyed due to lack to understand the preserving the precious fossil treasere.


Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: